Date: 2005-12-12 05:13 pm (UTC)
I disagree. I vastly prefer Gambon to Harris. Vastly. Poor Harris...not to speak ill of the dead, and certainly not in a tacky way...but with his portrayal of Dumbledore, one would have thought he'd passed on several years before his actual death. I found his interpretation--not soft-spoken, but moribund. I hated it. Gambon is every so often a little too tempermental, but not by much, and I'd far far rather have someone who is a little too emphatic than someone who comes off like thin, tired gruel.

As for the others:

Harry/Daniel Radcliffe: Glad he's not ending up looking like a leading man. One never gets the impression that the book-Harry will either. Apparently he is commonly misidentified as Elijah Wood on the street, or as "Frodo." Fortunately for him, he's better looking that Elijah.

Hermione: I'm liking her more and more as the actress matures and gets at least a LITTLE more in her delivery than "peevish snappiness."

Ron: Yeah, he's too tall, but he's still got that quite wonderful clownish face and is a dead ringer for his "older brothers" which is inspired and unexpected, since it's his new-found gangliness that aids in the illusion.

Draco: He's not grown much physically in the last few films, but that's because he shot up like a weed between the first and second film. In III, he looked like a young man while Harry and the rest still looked like boys.

Neville: Nah, he still has those horrid horsey teeth, in an otherwise somewhat handsome face--it allows him to still have that sweet awkwardness he needs.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

howeird: (Default)
howard stateman

September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213141516 17
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 05:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios