howeird: (Default)
howard stateman ([personal profile] howeird) wrote2011-02-18 05:08 pm

Wisconsin Greed and MSNBC grandstanding

Been watching MSNBC's cam-pain to make the greed of Wisconsin public employees appear to be a Noble Cause. The governor and most of the legislature was voted in on a platform to end public employee unions' choke hold on the state budget. The employees currently have a fully funded retirement program and pay NOTHING for health insurance. The bill they are protesting would have them pay a measly 12% of their health care and 5% of their retirement. That's basically about a 10% cut in take-home pay, because the money is all pre-tax, and the retirement part is deferred pay.

To put this in perspective, my last full time job paid nothing into my retirement, they merely set up a 401K program into which I could put my own pre-tax dollars. For health care (I found out when I went on COBRA) I paid 33% of the premiums. In other words, I would love to have the deal the folks are being offered in Madison.

One side thing, despite the Superbowl win by a Wisconsin team, I saw no Packers green being worn by protesters - but a lot of UW Badgers red. Losers.

Watching Ed Schultz last night rousing the rabble in front of the state house a la Glenn Beck, I was thoroughly disgusted. He's supposed to be covering and commenting on events, not making them.

[identity profile] smallship1.livejournal.com 2011-02-19 11:13 am (UTC)(link)
You would love to take a ten per cent cut in your after-tax salary? Your after-tax salary as a government employee?

If someone had offered us, back when we were government employees, a deal like that, we would have been UNABLE to take it, would have been forced to protest the bill, because a ten per cent cut in our take home pay then would have meant we could not survive. That's not "greed," that's irreducible minima. I don't know what actual money they get in Wisconsin, but I do know percentages never tell the whole story.

Perspective. Yes indeed, it can be useful.