Once upon a time I was a professional

[howeird]

...writer. I worked for newspapers in Oregon and Washington State, my main job was laying out the paper and writing headlines. I have a degree in this, which was earned by not only taking classes, but by writing for the campus paper, working as a proofreader and layout editor and photographer/darkroom tech.

I mention this in light of a recent posting on his blog by Tom Veal which kevin_standlee was kind enough to link to, in which Veal claims a blog's writing quality is going to be poor, as it is usually a "zeroth" draft (not even a first draft). He uses this argument to defend professional writers being nominated for and winning Best Fan Writer Hugo awards. I'm here to say that in my professional writer days, my zeroth draft was better than any amateur writer's "polished" essay. Besides, a professional writer won't be posting what first comes out his fingertips, he will always proofread and edit on the fly, which is something most amateurs will not.

I wonder, if I join WSFS, what I can do to change their constitution to make the Fan Writer Hugo into a "best fiction by a non-pro in a non-pro medium" award. Because, IMHO, they need to do this both to recognize the fen writers, and to make this award more credible.

Comments

[edith-mf.livejournal.com]

I think that is a guy arguing for his own specialness. It is hard to get past that kneejerk reaction until we become older in spirit, aged by being hit upside the head enough times so it becomes obvious there was and will always be people better somehow than us at any one thing we might attempt to excel.

[howeird]

In his defense, sort of, the nominations come from the members, so if a pro author is nominated in the fan writer category blame the fans, not the author.