howeird: (Default)
howard stateman ([personal profile] howeird) wrote2008-08-23 06:58 pm

Obama has officially lost my vote

I have nothing against Joe Biden. Obama has lost my vote by naming a running mate before he has officially been nominated. On top of his arrogant European tour and elitist Hawaiian vacation, this is just too much.

I'm a stickler for people following their own rules, which is why I don't read a lot of fantasy novels - most fantasy authors keep making up rules and exceptions to them as they go, and that's cheating. I like sci-fi because once the nature of the broken rule is established (warp drive, time machine, silicon life forms, etc.) the author stays within that framework.

The rules for Obama were simple:
1. There's an election by the delegates at the convention. No matter what the pundits and second-guessers say the vote total will be, it's not over till the delegates vote.

2. You don't get to choose a running mate until you are the official candidate.

It's called democracy. Obama apparently prefers the Chicago-style version.

[identity profile] yourbob.livejournal.com 2008-08-24 02:18 am (UTC)(link)
Honest query - where have you been the last umpteen years? The V.P. nominee has been picked by the presumed pres nom before the convention for at least thirty years or so. Ever since the death of brokered conventions. Reagan, Bush, Clinton and Bush all did it. I'm pretty sure Carter and Ford did it too. It's what's done. The only way it would not be done is if there were a real chance it would actually be a brokered convention.

And actually, in the U.S. for the last four hundred years or so it's called Representative Democracy, not Democracy. And anyway Obama's playing by his PARTY rules. Democracy has nothing to do with that.

[identity profile] smallship1.livejournal.com 2008-08-24 07:55 am (UTC)(link)
Well, me too, ideally. The idea of paying most of a pound for a Mars bar horrifies me, but I'm not going to get away with suing a shopkeeper because he won't sell me one for thruppence. And all this swearing on television...

The impression I've been getting, to be honest, was that Obama lost your vote a long time ago when he failed to be the candidate you wanted, and you were just waiting for him to do something to which you could materially object, so that you could take it away. I apologise unreservedly if that is in any way inaccurate.

It seems to me that if you want the Republicans out, the best way to assist that process is to steel yourself and vote Democrat, but that is between you and your conscience. If you truly feel there is no material difference between the parties or the candidates, then it doesn't matter whom you vote for, or even if you vote at all. This does, however, seem on the face of it (and from another country, admittedly) a rather flimsy reason for making that decision.

[identity profile] bovil.livejournal.com 2008-08-24 06:51 am (UTC)(link)
So you're saying you're going to vote for McCain, or that you're not going to vote for President (or are you going to vote third-party, not that there's any difference)?

There's no rule saying that Obama can't pick his running mate, it's just meaningless (officially) until the convention ratifies his nomination (and that's what it is, he's likely got the delegates, the hold-the-line Hillary crowd even knows it) and his selection.

[identity profile] bovil.livejournal.com 2008-08-24 07:05 pm (UTC)(link)
It's the prerogative of Democrats to admit they're wrong and change their minds. Only consistency fetishists Republicans have to stay the course and never admit they were wrong.

[identity profile] nolly.livejournal.com 2008-08-25 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Obama would have lost my vote when he votd in favor of telecom immunity. The only problem is, McCain's worse, and the last time I voted thise party was the first time Dubya ran...I'm not confident enough in the system to do that again right now. I'm basically just realy, really unhappy with the current slate.