howeird: (50-star Flag)
[personal profile] howeird
[livejournal.com profile] kproche started it, and it has been picked up by most of my FL:

A "No" vote on Proposition 8 will annul no marriages.
A "Yes" vote on Proposition 8 will annul over 10,000 marriages.
Which vote is really protecting marriage?

Truth is, Prop 8 probably won't annul any marriages. Atty. Gen. Brown has said as much. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/08/04/BA8P1250FN.DTL&tsp=1

It's rare for a right to be taken away retroactively, and the language of the amendment does not say anything about reaching back into the past. Think about it - we have very strict drunk driving laws, but nobody is being thrown in jail who was arrested for DUI prior to those laws. People who smoked indoors prior to the anti-smoking ordinances got away with it and are Scott-free. My favorite two strip joints are still in operation because the courts ruled it illegal to close them down when the zoning laws were changed in an attempt to boot them out.

I'm still voting against Prop 8, but I wish my side would stick to the facts.

Date: 2008-10-25 01:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] smallship1.livejournal.com
And when I wailed again in response to this one, [livejournal.com profile] elfwreck responded after this wise:

"Domestic partners do not have, as far as I know:

* Privileged communication
* Conjugal visits in prison
* Automatic inheritance without a will
* Automatic inclusion on each others' health insurance
* Legal parenthood of a child born to the other partner (in CA, if a married woman has a baby, the husband is legally the father, regardless of biology--he cannot claim "that's not my child" & refuse to pay for its upbringing. No idea how this ties to f-f marriages; I don't think it's come up yet.)

And, of course, all the social issues tied to the word "marriage"... if they're "just the same," why doesn't anyone get divorced in order to get a domestic partnership? You'd think that, comparing the various federal benefits of one or the other (income tax is the big one that comes to mind), it'd sometimes be advantageous to have a DP rather than a marriage."


Date: 2008-10-25 05:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] smallship1.livejournal.com
I could quote this back to [livejournal.com profile] elfwreck or somebody, but I'm sure s/he would have an answer and my mother didn't raise me to be a shuttlecock.

But even if it is purely an emotional issue, I agree with you that that doesn't make it any less important. Emotions, as I've said, drive us; if they're out of whack, everything we do suffers. Applying the courage/serenity/wisdom formula shows that this is something that need not be accepted and can be changed (or rather, for the moment, prevented from changing for the worse).

And yes, my country is retropic and hamstrung by outmoded ideas too. That's part of our charm. We're supposed to be the counterweight to California (smaller land area, so longer arm).

Profile

howeird: (Default)
howard stateman

September 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213141516 17
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 31st, 2025 04:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios