howeird: (Default)
howard stateman ([personal profile] howeird) wrote2008-11-05 08:38 am

Right?

In the United States, there is no Constitutional right to marry. Not for anyone.
vasilatos: neighborhod emergency response (high school)

[personal profile] vasilatos 2008-11-05 04:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, in California, there's now a constitutional ban on same sex marriage. Strikes me as an odd thing to throw into a constitution, but then the California constitution is a bit of a kitchen sink. That might be an understatement.

[identity profile] edith-mf.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 04:57 pm (UTC)(link)
The no on 8 people went at it like spoiled brats, and they paid for that. Wonder how this is going to affect transgender, they have been able to get married in the past to the now opposite sex I think.
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] iamradar.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 05:03 pm (UTC)(link)
As far as Prop 8 goes, no matter if it's "yes" or "no", I think it's going to wind up going to the courts.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] iamradar.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 05:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not talking about it going to the courts as far as the legislation goes, I'm talking about it going there due to the civil rights issues inherent in banning gay marriage. "Separate but equal" is an archaic and outdated notion, and has legal precident for being struck down.

[identity profile] yourbob.livejournal.com 2008-11-06 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
Only insofar as it is in conflict with the Federal Constitution. All other powers are devolved to the States (I think I've heard that somewhere....)

[identity profile] yourbob.livejournal.com 2008-11-06 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
The US Constitution is NOT (repeat NOT) the source of Rights. It only delineates or not, those Rights.