Can 'o' Worms
Jul. 7th, 2008 10:19 pmI can haz one opened. After the BASFA meeting I was talking with someone -- who shall remain nameless because Mind Like A Steel Sieve here can only remember his wife Carole's name, suffice to say long-time filker and filk party host and bona fide WorldCon Circus participant -- about the two bids to be decided at Montreal. Seattle and Reno are being bid, but what has my friend concerned is the Reno bid is being headed by someone from Portland.
We disagree on one point, and that is how important it is for local fandom to buy into and support a WorldCon. His opinion, which has the weight of experience behind it, is that local fan support will make or break a WorldCon. I, on the other hand, a fair weather fan but also veteran of many trade shows and work-related conventions, believe that anyone with reasonable travel agent/convention organizing skills, backed by the WSFS and its SMOFs, can put on a successful WorldCon in Reno, regardless of where they are based.
My argument hinges on three things:
1. It's a WORLDcon. Fans will come from all over the world regardless, and that includes gophers
2. It's a WORLDcon. People from all over the world, with the help of WSFS, will come forward to be program chair, party maven, hotel liaison, etc.
3. It's RENO, one of the most convention-centric cities on the planet. There's a stellar Chamber of Commerce and Visitors' Bureau willing to help bring 5,000 bodies into town to spend money and help the balance of trade stats.
We agree that it would help if local fandom was gung-ho about hosting a WorldCon. We disagree that it would make or break the con.
I can't see a lot of potential GoHs turning down a paid trip to Reno, whether the invitation email comes from someone in Reno or Portland. Or Iceland, for that matter. I can't see fans staying away in droves just because an international convention is chaired by someone from out of town.
Part of the opposing viewpoint is emotional (that's not a value judgment, just an observation) - WorldCon has always had pride-of-host as part of its charm. And local folks can more easily steer the con leaders away from stupid mistakes which an out-of-towner might make. But I don't buy either of these for a WorldCon. Regional and local cons, absolutely, but not a WorldCon, and not in Reno. Someone from Portland can get to Reno easily - it's a 1.5 hour flight - and staying in hotels would be part of the legitimate research.
I'll leave it at that. Feel free to chime in. Keep it friendly.
We disagree on one point, and that is how important it is for local fandom to buy into and support a WorldCon. His opinion, which has the weight of experience behind it, is that local fan support will make or break a WorldCon. I, on the other hand, a fair weather fan but also veteran of many trade shows and work-related conventions, believe that anyone with reasonable travel agent/convention organizing skills, backed by the WSFS and its SMOFs, can put on a successful WorldCon in Reno, regardless of where they are based.
My argument hinges on three things:
1. It's a WORLDcon. Fans will come from all over the world regardless, and that includes gophers
2. It's a WORLDcon. People from all over the world, with the help of WSFS, will come forward to be program chair, party maven, hotel liaison, etc.
3. It's RENO, one of the most convention-centric cities on the planet. There's a stellar Chamber of Commerce and Visitors' Bureau willing to help bring 5,000 bodies into town to spend money and help the balance of trade stats.
We agree that it would help if local fandom was gung-ho about hosting a WorldCon. We disagree that it would make or break the con.
I can't see a lot of potential GoHs turning down a paid trip to Reno, whether the invitation email comes from someone in Reno or Portland. Or Iceland, for that matter. I can't see fans staying away in droves just because an international convention is chaired by someone from out of town.
Part of the opposing viewpoint is emotional (that's not a value judgment, just an observation) - WorldCon has always had pride-of-host as part of its charm. And local folks can more easily steer the con leaders away from stupid mistakes which an out-of-towner might make. But I don't buy either of these for a WorldCon. Regional and local cons, absolutely, but not a WorldCon, and not in Reno. Someone from Portland can get to Reno easily - it's a 1.5 hour flight - and staying in hotels would be part of the legitimate research.
I'll leave it at that. Feel free to chime in. Keep it friendly.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-08 11:00 pm (UTC)Of course, it's common for program participants, staff and volunteers to be reimbursed after the fact, when continuing positive cash-flow is no longer a concern.
The LA Worldcons are the only regular exception to this. For them every program participant gets a comped membership and a "Guest of Guest." It makes for very weird programming maneuvering to keep the comps down.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-09 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-09 01:11 am (UTC)World Fantasy and World Horror are even more serious networking venues for the pros.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-09 03:38 pm (UTC)(Read: "My personal experience of convention policies is the entire universe, and nothing else matters. Your knowledge of anything I haven't personally experienced is meaningless.")
Even when, as is usually the case, Worldcons require that everyone except the Guests of Honor have paid memberships, they usually have people banging down the doors trying to be on programming. I suggested we schedule a single panel for 2 AM in the fountain in Plaza de Cesar Chavez and schedule every one of those "I must be on programming even though you don't have any use for me" people on The Contractual Obligation Panel, while making certain that this one panel didn't qualify you for post-con membership reimbursement should the convention have sufficient funds to do so. Programming didn't take me up on the suggestion, though.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-09 03:52 pm (UTC)